9709 Pure Mathematics 1 Oct/Nov 2020 Paper 11
9709 Pure Mathematics 1 Oct/Nov 2020 Paper 11: all 23 questions and parts with their marks, taken from the published mark scheme rather than estimated.
Every question in 9709 Pure Mathematics 1 Oct/Nov 2020 Paper 11
23 questions and parts, 75 marks in total. Marks come from the published mark scheme.
Question 1
3 marks · 3/75This tests the use of a discriminant to determine when a line and a quadratic curve have no common point.
Examiner report: The successful approach was generally to remove y first and then analyse the resulting quadratic. Attempts based on removing x tended not to lead to a workable condition.
Question 2
4 marks · 7/75This assesses integration of a derivative and use of a point on a curve to determine the integration constant.
Examiner report: Candidates who treated the given derivative as something to integrate usually made good progress, especially once they used the supplied point to determine the constant.
Question 3
3 marks · 10/75This tests related rates for a sphere, including linking the rates of change of volume and radius.
Examiner report: Very few responses made the necessary chain-rule connection between the two rates.
Question 4
3 marks · 13/75Question 5 (a)
4 marks · 17/75This tests selection of terms in a binomial expansion and comparison of their coefficients.
Examiner report: Many candidates expanded far more of the binomial than was needed. The key difficulty was retaining the correct powers of both 2 and a in the two selected terms.
Question 5 (b)
1 mark · 18/75Question 6
5 marks · 23/75This assesses differentiation of a composite square-root function and selection of a valid point with a specified gradient.
Examiner report: The differentiation was usually manageable, but many candidates retained an extraneous value created when the equation was squared and failed to test it in the original condition.
Question 7 (a)
3 marks · 26/75Question 7 (b)
3 marks · 29/75This tests solving a trigonometric equation using an identity and listing all solutions in a specified interval.
Examiner report: The positive tangent case was usually handled, but the solution associated with negative tangent was often omitted.
Question 8 (a)
3 marks · 32/75This assesses the sum-to-infinity formula for geometric progressions and elimination of common quantities.
Examiner report: Most candidates knew the infinite geometric-sum formula and could begin the elimination, although some did not complete the algebra linking the two ratios.
Question 8 (b)
4 marks · 36/75This tests combining a term relationship in geometric progressions with an earlier ratio relation to find a sum in terms of the first term.
Examiner report: The second part was often not attempted unless the first ratio relation had been obtained. The essential step was eliminating one ratio before determining the required sum.
Question 9 (a)
2 marks · 38/75This tests finding a tangent to a circle from the coordinates of its centre and a point of contact.
Examiner report: This was generally an accessible part, with many candidates correctly using perpendicular gradients to connect the diameter and tangent.
Question 9 (b)
3 marks · 41/75This assesses finding a circle equation from its centre and a point on its circumference.
Examiner report: The standard centre-radius form led to more reliable work than the general circle equation, where sign errors were frequent.
Question 9 (c)
3 marks · 44/75This tests finding intersections of a line and circle by substitution and solving a quadratic.
Examiner report: Candidates who had correct equations from the earlier parts generally completed this by eliminating y and solving the resulting quadratic.
Question 10 (a)
3 marks · 47/75This tests the use of right-triangle trigonometry and the tangent-radius property in a sector configuration.
Examiner report: The geometric setup was the main obstacle; those who recognised the right triangle and related the radius to the tangent generally proceeded successfully.
Question 10 (b)
3 marks · 50/75This assesses sector perimeter calculations using an arc-length formula and the radius obtained in part (a).
Examiner report: The arc-length formula was usually known, but some candidates incorrectly used the small circle's radius instead of the sector radius for the arc and straight sides.
Question 10 (c)
4 marks · 54/75This tests area calculation in a composite sector diagram involving a triangle or kite and a circular sector.
Examiner report: Successful solutions separated the kite-shaped contribution from the sector contribution. The sector-area formula was often available, but combining the two geometrical regions correctly was less common.
Question 11 (a)
1 mark · 55/75Question 11 (b)
4 marks · 59/75This tests inversion of a composite function and identification of the inverse function's domain.
Examiner report: Working from the unexpanded composite made the inverse more straightforward. The domain was sometimes missed, although it could be obtained directly from the original range or the inverse expression.
Question 11 (c)
4 marks · 63/75Question 12 (a)
4 marks · 67/75This tests finding intersections between a square-root curve and a straight line by reducing the equation to a quadratic.
Examiner report: Using √x as the quadratic variable was usually more dependable than isolating the radical and squaring, which sometimes introduced errors.
Question 12 (b)
2 marks · 69/75This tests demonstrating that a point on a curve is stationary by evaluating its derivative there.
Examiner report: A direct derivative evaluation at the known coordinate was sufficient, and most candidates who attempted this part could complete it.
Question 12 (c)
6 marks · 75/75
Grade thresholds for this paper
| Session | Paper | A | B | C | D | E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9709 Pure Mathematics 1 Oct/Nov 2020 Paper 11 | 11 | 52 | 44 | 34 | 24 | 14 |