9709 Pure Mathematics 1 Feb/Mar 2021 Paper 12
9709 Pure Mathematics 1 Feb/Mar 2021 Paper 12: all 24 questions and parts with their marks, taken from the published mark scheme rather than estimated.
Every question in 9709 Pure Mathematics 1 Feb/Mar 2021 Paper 12
24 questions and parts, 75 marks in total. Marks come from the published mark scheme.
Question 1 (a)
1 mark · 1/75Question 1 (b)
2 marks · 3/75This tests applying the binomial expansion when the quantity substituted for x is negative and contains a factor of 2.
Examiner report: The negative multiple inside the bracket caused errors for some candidates, but many obtained the expansion correctly.
Question 1 (c)
2 marks · 5/75This tests finding a specified coefficient by multiplying two truncated polynomial expansions and collecting terms of the required degree.
Examiner report: Candidates who had obtained both preceding expansions generally selected the relevant products successfully.
Question 2
4 marks · 9/75This tests reducing an equation containing a repeated squared expression to a polynomial equation through substitution, then solving and reversing the substitution.
Examiner report: This was usually accessible when a substitution was made. Unsupported calculator solutions did not demonstrate the required algebraic method.
Question 3
4 marks · 13/75Question 4
5 marks · 18/75This tests finding when a line and a parabola meet at two distinct points by forming a quadratic in x and applying the discriminant condition.
Examiner report: The elimination and discriminant approach was widely understood, but calculator-only solutions for the final quadratic in k could lose method credit.
Question 5 (a)
4 marks · 22/75This tests reading a graph to identify and describe the vertical stretch and horizontal translation that form a combined transformation.
Examiner report: The two changes were often recognised, but descriptions were sometimes too vague or assigned the increased vertical displacement to a translation instead of a vertical stretch.
Question 5 (b)
2 marks · 24/75This tests expressing a graph obtained by combining a vertical scale change and a horizontal shift in function notation.
Examiner report: Those who correctly interpreted the graph usually transferred the two changes into function notation; some obtained the expression independently even without completing the previous part.
Question 6 (a)
3 marks · 27/75This tests using related rates and the chain rule to connect the rate of change of y with respect to time to the rate of change of x with respect to time.
Examiner report: The chain-rule approach was common, and identifying the requested x-with-time rate usually led to the correct result.
Question 6 (b)
4 marks · 31/75This tests integrating a given derivative and using a point on the curve to determine the integration constant.
Examiner report: Most candidates recognised the need to integrate and often found the constant correctly; some stopped before explicitly giving the final equation of the curve.
Question 7 (a)
3 marks · 34/75This tests completing the square for a restricted quadratic function and using its domain to determine the range.
Examiner report: The completed-square form was generally found, but the domain restriction led some candidates to choose the wrong side of the range.
Question 7 (b)
2 marks · 36/75This tests finding the inverse of a one-to-one restricted quadratic function by interchanging variables and selecting the branch consistent with the original domain.
Examiner report: The algebraic rearrangement was usually understood, but the correct branch was chosen only by candidates who used the original domain properly.
Question 7 (c)
3 marks · 39/75This tests composing two functions, forming a quadratic equation, and rejecting solutions that do not lie in the domain of the inner function.
Examiner report: Most candidates formed the quadratic, but some gave insufficient work for solving it or retained a root outside the permitted domain.
Question 8 (a)
5 marks · 44/75This tests determining a circle from three points by recognising its centre and radius from the coordinate geometry.
Examiner report: The geometrical observation involving the three points commonly led to a correct circle. Direct substitution into a general circle equation was less reliable because of algebraic slips.
Question 8 (b)
2 marks · 46/75This tests finding a tangent to a circle by using the perpendicular relationship between the tangent and the radius at the point of contact.
Examiner report: This part was often left blank. Candidates who used the centre from the earlier part generally proceeded correctly, whereas treating AC as parallel to the tangent was invalid.
Question 9 (a)(i)
3 marks · 49/75This tests using the sum to infinity of a geometric progression to determine its common ratio and hence its second term.
Examiner report: Most candidates used the infinite-sum formula effectively and obtained the second term, often helped by the form of the stated sum.
Question 9 (a)(ii)
2 marks · 51/75This tests evaluating a finite geometric sum for twelve terms after substituting a specified angle.
Examiner report: The formula was generally known, but some solutions did not make the angle substitution or subsequent numerical work sufficiently explicit.
Question 9 (b)
4 marks · 55/75This tests finding an arithmetic progression term from its first two terms and then applying the nth-term formula at a specified angle.
Examiner report: The common difference was often found correctly. Errors mainly occurred when substituting the angle or when a sum formula was used instead of the nth-term relation.
Question 10 (a)
5 marks · 60/75This tests modelling equal areas in a sector by equating the sector area with twice the area of the isosceles triangle formed by the two marked points.
Examiner report: Most candidates identified the equal-area relationship and used the sector formula correctly. A minority struggled with radians or with attempts based on a triangle’s height and base.
Question 10 (b)
3 marks · 63/75This tests generalising the equal-area model to an angle theta and solving the resulting inequality for a length ratio constrained to be below one.
Examiner report: This was frequently omitted. Even when the general area equation was obtained, some candidates included negative values that are impossible for the positive length ratio.
Question 11 (a)
2 marks · 65/75This tests finding an x-axis intercept by setting the curve’s y-coordinate to zero and solving an equation involving negative fractional powers.
Examiner report: Most candidates began by setting y to zero and often reached the correct intercept, but unsupported numerical answers received no credit.
Question 11 (b)
4 marks · 69/75This tests differentiating a curve, evaluating its gradient at an intercept, and forming the tangent equation there.
Examiner report: Correct derivative expressions were common, though a small number of candidates found a normal instead of the requested tangent.
Question 11 (c)
2 marks · 71/75This tests locating a stationary point by setting the derivative equal to zero and solving for x.
Examiner report: Most attempts used the correct stationary-point condition and produced valid working; as in part (a), unsupported answers were not sufficient.
Question 11 (d)
4 marks · 75/75This tests finding a bounded area by integrating the curve between its x-axis intercept and the specified vertical line.
Examiner report: Many candidates used the intercept as the lower limit and showed the endpoint substitution. The area calculation was generally successful when the integration was correct.
Grade thresholds for this paper
| Session | Paper | A | B | C | D | E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9709 Pure Mathematics 1 Feb/Mar 2021 Paper 12 | 12 | 55 | 46 | 35 | 24 | 13 |