9709 Pure Mathematics 1 Oct/Nov 2021 Paper 11
9709 Pure Mathematics 1 Oct/Nov 2021 Paper 11: all 26 questions and parts with their marks, taken from the published mark scheme rather than estimated.
Every question in 9709 Pure Mathematics 1 Oct/Nov 2021 Paper 11
26 questions and parts, 75 marks in total. Marks come from the published mark scheme.
Question 1 (a)
1 mark · 1/75This tests expansion and simplification of a squared binomial containing a reciprocal term.
Examiner report: Errors commonly occurred in the middle term, especially through mishandling the power of x.
Question 1 (b)
2 marks · 3/75This tests use of the binomial theorem to obtain an expansion in ascending powers of x.
Examiner report: Some responses lost marks through incorrect coefficients or by leaving out the constant term.
Question 1 (c)
2 marks · 5/75This tests selection and combination of products that contribute to a specified power in a product of expansions.
Examiner report: The clearest solutions considered only the relevant products; multiplying everything out often created avoidable errors.
Question 2
5 marks · 10/75This tests using the discriminant to find parameter values for which a curve and a line have no common point.
Examiner report: Sign mistakes in forming the quadratic were frequent, and some candidates found only the boundary values rather than the required intervals.
Question 3
4 marks · 14/75This tests factorisation of a trigonometric equation followed by solving the resulting equations over a stated interval.
Examiner report: Replacing tangent by sine divided by cosine made the algebra longer and often prevented candidates from reaching both valid solutions.
Question 4 (a)
4 marks · 18/75This tests simultaneous use of the infinite geometric-series sum and the finite arithmetic-series sum.
Examiner report: A common mistake was to use the formula for an arithmetic term instead of its sum; sign and arithmetic slips were also seen.
Question 4 (b)
2 marks · 20/75This tests finding the position of a zero term in an arithmetic progression.
Examiner report: Even when part (a) was unsuccessful, a correct general-term equation using the candidate’s value of a could still demonstrate the required method.
Question 5 (a)
3 marks · 23/75Question 5 (b)(i)
1 mark · 24/75Question 5 (b)(ii)
1 mark · 25/75Question 6 (a)
3 marks · 28/75This tests finding arc lengths and combining them with a straight side to obtain the perimeter of a composite circular shape.
Examiner report: Some candidates could not extract the required sector angle from the diagram, preventing progress with the arc calculation.
Question 6 (b)
4 marks · 32/75This tests finding the exact area of a shape made from circular sectors, segments, and a triangle.
Examiner report: Several approaches were accepted, but errors included halving the triangle area incorrectly and using an unsuitable triangle-area formula.
Question 7 (a)
2 marks · 34/75This tests finding a circle’s radius from its centre and a point on the circumference, then writing its equation.
Examiner report: Frequent errors included using the radius rather than its square and assigning an incorrect sign in the circle equation.
Question 7 (b)
7 marks · 41/75This tests finding the intersections of a line and circle and then calculating the exact chord length.
Examiner report: The main difficulties were eliminating the variable accurately, solving the resulting quadratic, and completing the final distance calculation when coordinates were available.
Question 8 (a)
2 marks · 43/75This tests completing the square for a quadratic expression.
Examiner report: Most candidates found the horizontal shift, but fewer obtained the correct constant term as well.
Question 8 (b)
1 mark · 44/75Question 8 (c)
1 mark · 45/75This tests finding the range of a restricted quadratic function.
Examiner report: Incorrect inequality directions and expressions describing the domain rather than the range were common.
Question 8 (d)
3 marks · 48/75This tests finding an inverse function algebraically while respecting the original restricted domain.
Examiner report: The algebra was familiar to many candidates, but the branch inconsistent with the original domain was often retained.
Question 8 (e)
3 marks · 51/75This tests applying a two-dimensional translation to a quadratic graph and expanding the result.
Examiner report: Correct solutions used either the original or completed-square form, while others made errors in modifying the equation.
Question 9 (a)
4 marks · 55/75This tests integrating a derivative and using a known function value to determine the constant of integration.
Examiner report: Many candidates integrated successfully, but omitting the integration constant prevented completion of the question.
Question 9 (b)
5 marks · 60/75This tests finding stationary points by solving a disguised quadratic equation in x² and evaluating the original function.
Examiner report: A suitable factorisation or substitution was needed for the method marks; arithmetic mistakes in the y-coordinates were particularly common.
Question 9 (c)
1 mark · 61/75Question 9 (d)
2 marks · 63/75This tests classifying stationary points using the second-derivative test.
Examiner report: The intended follow-through was to use the second derivative at the values found earlier; unsupported labels without evaluated signs were not sufficient.
Question 10 (a)
4 marks · 67/75This tests evaluating an improper integral involving a shifted power of a linear expression.
Examiner report: Index manipulation caused difficulty, particularly losing the factor introduced by differentiating the linear expression or failing to evaluate the limiting term.
Question 10 (b)
4 marks · 71/75This tests finding a volume of revolution by integrating the square of a curve’s ordinate.
Examiner report: The most frequent omission was the squaring required by the volume formula; some otherwise sound attempts then had only a coefficient error.
Question 10 (c)
4 marks · 75/75This tests finding a normal’s y-intercept from the derivative at a specified point.
Examiner report: Some candidates found the derivative and tangent gradient but did not complete the separate step of using the normal line to obtain the intercept.
Grade thresholds for this paper
| Session | Paper | A | B | C | D | E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9709 Pure Mathematics 1 Oct/Nov 2021 Paper 11 | 11 | 50 | 40 | 30 | 21 | 11 |