Skip to main content

9709 Pure Mathematics 1 Oct/Nov 2023 Paper 11

9709 Pure Mathematics 1 Oct/Nov 2023 Paper 11: all 26 questions and parts with their marks, taken from the published mark scheme rather than estimated.

Every question in 9709 Pure Mathematics 1 Oct/Nov 2023 Paper 11

26 questions and parts, 75 marks in total. Marks come from the published mark scheme.

  1. Question 1 (a)

    2 marks · 2/75

    This tests the use of the binomial theorem to obtain specified terms of an expansion.

    Examiner report: Most candidates used the binomial method successfully. A frequent mistake was mishandling the squared factor when forming the third term.

    Question paper p.3Mark scheme p.6

  2. Question 1 (b)

    2 marks · 4/75

    This tests selecting and combining only the products that contribute to a particular coefficient in a product of polynomials.

    Examiner report: The report found that stronger responses used the three relevant products rather than expanding every term; a complete expansion was viewed as unnecessary and time-consuming.

    Question paper p.3Mark scheme p.6

  3. Question 2

    4 marks · 8/75

    This tests comparing a line and a curve by forming a quadratic intersection equation and analysing its discriminant.

    Examiner report: Sign errors occurred while forming the quadratic or its discriminant. Some candidates incorrectly treated a positive discriminant as zero, so the link between discriminant sign and the number of intersections was not always understood.

    Question paper p.4Mark scheme p.6

  4. Question 3

    3 marks · 11/75

    This tests related rates involving the volume of a cube and the chain rule.

    Examiner report: This was difficult for many candidates, with numerous attempts avoiding differentiation altogether. Successful work used the volume derivative followed by the chain rule.

    Question paper p.5Mark scheme p.7

  5. Question 4 (a)

    2 marks · 13/75

    This tests applying a reflection and then a translation to the graph of a quadratic, while respecting the order of transformations.

    Examiner report: Sign mistakes were common, although stronger candidates obtained both transformed equations correctly.

    Question paper p.6Mark scheme p.7

  6. Question 4 (b)

    2 marks · 15/75

    This tests applying the same two transformations in the reverse order and recognising that transformation order matters.

    Examiner report: Many candidates lost the first mark through a sign or order error but were more often able to gain the mark for presenting a quadratic form.

    Question paper p.6Mark scheme p.7

  7. Question 4 (c)

    2 marks · 17/75

    This tests comparing two transformed graphs and describing the single transformation relating them.

    Examiner report: Candidates who had reliable results in the first two parts generally identified this translation. Follow-through credit was available when the earlier equations led to a vertical shift.

    Question paper p.6Mark scheme p.7

  8. Question 5 (a)

    3 marks · 20/75

    This tests transforming a trigonometric equation containing tangent and reciprocal sine into a quadratic in cosine.

    Examiner report: A sound route was to replace tangent before multiplying through by sine. Algebraic manipulation errors prevented many candidates from completing the reduction.

    Question paper p.7Mark scheme p.8

  9. Question 5 (b)

    3 marks · 23/75

    This tests solving a trigonometric equation through a quadratic in cosine and listing every solution in a full degree interval.

    Examiner report: Full credit depended on showing how the quadratic was solved and then finding both angles. Incomplete methods and omitted solutions were common; checking candidates' values in the original equation was also advised.

    Question paper p.7Mark scheme p.8

  10. Question 6 (a)

    1 mark · 24/75

    Question paper p.8Mark scheme p.8

  11. Question 6 (b)

    1 mark · 25/75

    Question paper p.8Mark scheme p.8

  12. Question 6 (c)

    5 marks · 30/75

    This tests finding the exact area of a compound circular shape using sectors, triangles, and circular segments.

    Examiner report: This was one of the more demanding parts because candidates had to devise the area decomposition themselves. Partial attempts often found a sector, triangle, or segment, while a complete strategy was uncommon.

    Question paper p.9Mark scheme p.9

  13. Question 7

    7 marks · 37/75

    This tests solving for the terms of a geometric progression from a finite sum and an infinite sum, with a sign restriction on the ratio.

    Examiner report: The initial sum equations were often correct. Methods that left the first-two-term expression unsimplified tended to create a more complicated equation and more errors, whereas stronger candidates used the negative solution as instructed.

    Question paper p.11Mark scheme p.12

  14. Question 8 (a)

    4 marks · 41/75

    This tests using a substitution to solve the intersections of two polynomial curves and then recovering both coordinates.

    Examiner report: Some candidates forgot to take square roots after solving for the squared variable, while others treated the substituted variable as x. Correctly recovering both coordinates was essential.

    Question paper p.12Mark scheme p.15

  15. Question 8 (b)

    5 marks · 46/75

    This tests finding the exact area between two curves by integrating their vertical difference over the intersection interval.

    Examiner report: Most candidates who attempted this part understood that integration and both limits were required. Calculator-only answers without displayed limit substitution did not receive the associated method credit.

    Question paper p.13Mark scheme p.16

  16. Question 9 (a)

    2 marks · 48/75

    Question paper p.14Mark scheme p.17

  17. Question 9 (b)

    3 marks · 51/75

    This tests finding the domain of a composite function by requiring the output of one function to lie within the domain of the next.

    Examiner report: Successful solutions worked directly from the range restriction on f. A number of candidates instead tried to form the composite function, which did not address the domain condition.

    Question paper p.14Mark scheme p.18

  18. Question 9 (c)

    1 mark · 52/75

    This tests forming and simplifying a composite function by substituting one quadratic function into a linear function.

    Examiner report: Most candidates gained the available mark, and equivalent simplified forms were accepted.

    Question paper p.15Mark scheme p.18

  19. Question 9 (d)

    3 marks · 55/75

    This tests finding an inverse function for a restricted quadratic by completing the square and selecting the branch determined by the domain.

    Examiner report: Completing the square first made this part accessible. The main difficulty was choosing the branch consistent with the original domain; attempts starting from the uncompleted quadratic generally made no progress.

    Question paper p.15Mark scheme p.18

  20. Question 10 (a)

    3 marks · 58/75

    This tests integrating a second derivative and using a stationary-point condition to determine the integration constant.

    Examiner report: The reliable method was to integrate before applying the stationary condition. A common error was substituting the point's y-coordinate into an equation involving dy/dx.

    Question paper p.16Mark scheme p.19

  21. Question 10 (b)

    3 marks · 61/75

    This tests integrating a first derivative and using a known point on the curve to determine the second constant.

    Examiner report: Most candidates who reached this part integrated their derivative and used the supplied point appropriately.

    Question paper p.16Mark scheme p.19

  22. Question 10 (c)

    3 marks · 64/75

    This tests locating the remaining stationary point and classifying it using the second derivative.

    Examiner report: Candidates generally found the stationary x-values by setting the gradient to zero. Those who classified the point usually used the second derivative, which was the appropriate test.

    Question paper p.17Mark scheme p.20

  23. Question 10 (d)

    2 marks · 66/75

    This tests finding a tangent line from the curve's y-axis intercept and the derivative at that point.

    Examiner report: Successful responses supplied both ingredients: the gradient from the derivative and the intercept from the curve equation. Omitting either prevented completion.

    Question paper p.17Mark scheme p.20

  24. Question 11 (a)

    3 marks · 69/75

    This tests finding the chord joining the contact points of parallel tangents to a circle.

    Examiner report: Stronger candidates used the centre and the perpendicular-radius property to form the line. Some identified the centre but did not continue to the equation.

    Question paper p.18Mark scheme p.20

  25. Question 11 (b)

    4 marks · 73/75

    This tests finding a circle-line intersection and expressing the selected point in surd form.

    Examiner report: Candidates who had a correct line in the previous part usually substituted successfully. The quadratic had to be solved and the correct intersection selected for A.

    Question paper p.19Mark scheme p.21

  26. Question 11 (c)

    2 marks · 75/75

    This tests finding the tangent at a known point on a circle when its gradient is specified.

    Examiner report: Candidates with the coordinates of A often earned at least the method mark by using the tangent equation through that point.

    Question paper p.19Mark scheme p.21

Grade thresholds for this paper

SessionPaperABCDE
9709 Pure Mathematics 1 Oct/Nov 2023 Paper 11115544342414

Every Pure Mathematics 1 session and its thresholds

9709 grade thresholds for Oct/Nov 2023, every paper